Love Health

Recently, the U.S. Food and Administration plans to advise pregnant women and women to avoid eating shark, king mackerel, swordfish and fish side first, because four of mercury in fish may affect brain growth and development.

Fish is widely recognized as health foods, fish contains some fat to protect the heart. However, the different types of fish will be an accumulation of different amounts of mercury, which is a harmful effect on health of the natural elements.

Recently, the U.S. Food and Administration plans to advise pregnant women and women to avoid eating shark, king mackerel, swordfish and fish side first, because four of mercury in fish may affect brain growth and development.

It is worth noting that because tuna contains less mercury and are not included in the scope of the fasting pregnant women. However, there are responsible for the development of the mercury regulations are of the view that women during pregnancy to eat a lot of canned tuna is not good, and in some areas have restrictions on pregnant women to eat tuna a week, not the volume of more than 198 grams.

Mercury into the body of pregnant women, can damage the fetus’s central nervous system, resulting in lower cognitive ability, some people believe that the impact of mercury per year by about 60,000 children. Food and Drug Administration is warning for pregnant women, but also to remind the mother and child care not to over-consumption of the aforementioned four types of fish.

However, if there are any last night, Ms. eating swordfish, but now they need not panic, because they eat fish is harmful mercury accumulated over a long period, sometimes twice a food is not the cause illness. To protect the unborn baby’s health, the best way is to avoid eating four types of fish.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the United States Environmental Protection Agency staff members said that pregnant women can safely eat each week canned tuna, shellfish and small fish. As far as possible to eat different kinds of fish, do not eat a concentrated, the average weekly amount of fish not super not have to worry about 340 grams of mercury intake.If the fish in each unit containing one million units of the following methylmercury (mercury in fish is in a form), it is safe. The greater volume of fish, the more the amount of methyl mercury, including from the small fish in the water and devour them access to the methyl mercury.

As early as 10 years ago, the United States of the rights and interests of consumers who had suggested that the United States Food and Drug Administration cautioned that pregnant women should be careful of mercury. This is a very easy for pregnant women and children in harm’s potential factors. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has made public health efforts in many, but the United States in the public interest research center is still surprised by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration did not pay attention to the tuna included in the scope of the film.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration refused to disclose the canned tuna in mercury content, but said the shark, swordfish, king mackerel fish mercury content of more than three times higher than fresh tuna, tuna in mercury content is far lower On the other fish. However, tuna is a film with big fish do not like canned tuna is less mercury than fish do, and therefore in the public interest research center that Caroline · Smith· Side Wa should urge the agency to re - Notes to amend the food of pregnant women.

The marine food industry trade organizations, the National Fisheries Association, questioned, in the end swordfish and other types of mercury in fish really reach the level of harm to human health, the association will be recalled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s report, examine it Impartiality.

At present, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration enacted by the mercury content of the standard is still in dispute. Last year, a scientific report that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be followed to protect environmental protection as stipulated by the regulations because they are better than the standard U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s strict four times, including tuna, the U.S. Food and Drug Authority has also begun to consider whether to change their standards.